A Father Looking for His Missing Son Ends Up Under Arrest
A father walks into a police department looking for help finding his missing child. Instead of walking away with answers, he ends up being pepper-sprayed, physically taken into custody, and charged with two offenses.
That is the situation surrounding Edward Corristan and Mena Police Department Sergeant Eddie Price in Mena, Arkansas.
And the question I want answered is simple: How did an encounter involving a father seeking assistance escalate to the point that a police sergeant used force against him?
I have spent years examining police encounters, defensive tactics, officer decision-making, and the use of force. One of the biggest problems I see when discussing controversial police incidents is the tendency to jump immediately to one side or the other.
Either the officer must have been justified because someone was arrested, or the officer must have been wrong because the encounter looks terrible on video.
Neither conclusion is good enough.
I want to know what happened, what led to the confrontation, what the officer reasonably perceived, and whether the decisions made were consistent with professional policing.
Because wearing a badge does not eliminate the responsibility to explain your actions.
<
What Happened Outside the Mena Police Department?
On March 15, 2026, Edward Corristan, 35, was arrested following an encounter outside the Mena Police Department in Polk County, Arkansas.
The encounter reportedly involved Sergeant Eddie Price, who used pepper spray and physical force while taking Corristan into custody.
Corristan was charged with interference with a law enforcement officer and disorderly conduct. The arrest and charges are documented in local police reporting published by My Pulse News.
According to accounts surrounding the incident, Corristan had been seeking police assistance regarding his missing son.
Additional publicly circulated records describe a March 11, 2026, custody order granting Corristan primary custody and directing law-enforcement assistance if necessary.
The encounter gained widespread attention in October 2026 after video footage circulated online, generating criticism of the department’s response.
According to information attributed to the Mena Police Department, an initial internal review found no wrongdoing by Sergeant Price.
Corristan was reportedly found guilty and fined in Mena District Court on July 21, 2026, under case number MNC-26-141.
That reported court outcome deserves attention, but it does not independently answer whether every application of force during the arrest was necessary or reasonable.
Those are separate questions.
Subscribe on YouTube and join thousands of officers, attorneys, and citizens who follow Cop Talk LIVE for fact-based analysis—not headlines.
▶ Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/@CopTalkLIVE
My Concern: When Does Officer Authority Become a Physical Confrontation?
There is something every police officer needs to understand.
Having the authority to issue commands does not automatically mean every use of force that follows a disagreement is justified.
Police officers routinely encounter people who are angry, emotional, frustrated, uncooperative, and sometimes openly disrespectful.
That comes with the profession.
And when a father believes his child is missing, the potential for heightened emotions should surprise absolutely nobody.
Does that mean the father has unlimited freedom to behave however he wants? Of course not.
Does it mean an officer must tolerate an actual threat or physical aggression? Absolutely not.
But there is a substantial difference between a citizen being difficult and a citizen presenting a threat that reasonably requires force.
That distinction matters.
In evaluating this encounter, I want to know exactly what happened immediately before Sergeant Price deployed pepper spray.
Was there a credible threat of physical violence?
Was Corristan physically resisting?
Was he attempting to interfere with an identifiable police duty?
Did the officer have sufficient time and distance to employ a less confrontational response?
Were commands being issued to address a legitimate safety concern, and what did Corristan actually do in response?
These are not questions designed to automatically condemn an officer. They are questions that should be asked in any serious use-of-force analysis.
Pepper Spray and Physical Force Require More Than an Explanation of Disobedience
Pepper spray is a legitimate law-enforcement tool. Physical control techniques are also legitimate when the circumstances justify them.
But their legitimacy depends on the circumstances surrounding their use.
An officer’s decision to deploy an irritant, strike someone, or physically take someone to the ground must be evaluated against the facts reasonably known to the officer at that moment.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Graham v. Connor established the objective-reasonableness framework for evaluating excessive-force claims under the Fourth Amendment.
That analysis considers circumstances including the severity of the suspected offense, whether a person poses an immediate threat, and whether the person is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.
It also recognizes that officers sometimes must make rapid decisions under tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving circumstances.
I agree with that principle.
But what I refuse to do is treat every police command as though it automatically justifies whatever physical action follows.
The existence of an arrest does not eliminate the need to independently examine the force used to accomplish it.
Similarly, a video that looks troubling does not automatically establish a constitutional violation.
The complete sequence, the officer’s reasonable perceptions, and the available evidence matter.
If you’ve ever felt like you’re doing “all the right things” and still not seeing the scale budge, you’re not alone—and it’s maddening. Fat loss can feel like a constant battle against your own body: you cut calories, add workouts, skip desserts, and somehow… nothing changes. The good news is that the problem usually isn’t your effort. It’s that most approaches focus on quick fixes instead of the handful of principles that make results sustainable. CLICK HERE to learn more! https://www.nutritionconnectionbalance.com/sustainable-fat-loss-beyond-the-scale/
What About the Missing Child?
Another issue deserves serious attention.
The central reason Corristan reportedly approached police was his missing son.
According to public materials associated with the case, the child is identified as Craig “Kiki” Corristan, who was listed as missing from Mena, Arkansas.
Court documents circulated in connection with the case reportedly include a March 11 custody order directing law-enforcement assistance with enforcement if necessary.
The existence of that order does not, by itself, establish that Sergeant Price or the department violated it.
But it raises questions that deserve answers.
What did Corristan ask the department to do?
What information did the department have about the missing child?
What assistance had already been provided?
What did the court order specifically require, and what steps were taken after police received it?
I believe police officers have an obligation to take requests involving missing children seriously, communicate professionally, and make sound decisions based on the information available.
That responsibility does not disappear because a parent becomes frustrated.
Even if an arrest was legally supported, I still want to know what happened to the original request for assistance.
The arrest and the missing-child investigation are two distinct issues. Both deserve scrutiny.
The Department Cleared Its Sergeant. Is That the End of the Discussion?
According to the information reported about this incident, the Mena Police Department initially reviewed Sergeant Price’s conduct and found no wrongdoing.
I do not automatically dismiss an internal investigation simply because it was conducted by the officer’s own agency.
Nor do I automatically accept its findings without examining the basis for them.
The public deserves to understand what evidence was reviewed, what policies were applied, and what reasoning supported the department’s conclusions.
Reports circulating in October indicate that the incident was subsequently referred to the Arkansas State Police for an independent review.
That is a potentially important development.
An independent review can provide additional scrutiny, but a referral alone is not evidence that misconduct occurred.
I would be interested in knowing whether the review examines the complete encounter, the specific use-of-force decisions, relevant recordings, department policies, and the circumstances surrounding Corristan’s request for help.
If the force was justified, explain why.
If mistakes were made, identify them.
And if misconduct is established, address it appropriately.
That is how professional accountability should operate.
Discover the artistry of RedGlareUSA, a veteran-owned business crafting the most creative and unique items from spent bullet cases adorned with stunning Swarovski Crystals. Each piece is a testament to innovation, precision, and creative excellence—transforming ammunition into wearable art and collectible treasures all hand made in the USA! CLICK HERE to shop and support! https://redglareusa.com/
Professional Policing Is About More Than Being Legally Correct
Here is where I believe policing needs to raise its standards.
A police officer can sometimes take an action that is legally permissible and still demonstrate poor communication, questionable judgment, or ineffective tactics.
Those issues should not be ignored merely because criminal or constitutional liability is not established.
I want officers who understand the law, but I also want officers who know how to control themselves, manage confrontation, communicate under pressure, and recognize when their own decisions may be escalating an encounter.
That is especially important for supervisors.
A sergeant is not simply an officer with additional authority.
A sergeant is supposed to represent leadership, experience, judgment, and an example for the officers who serve under that supervisor.
When a supervisor becomes involved in a controversial use-of-force encounter, I believe that encounter deserves the same rigorous examination we would expect for any other officer.
Professional standards must apply regardless of rank.
My Final Assessment: The Questions Have Not Been Fully Answered
What concerns me most about the Mena incident is the number of important questions that remain surrounding the encounter.
A father reportedly sought help regarding a missing child.
A physical confrontation occurred outside a police station.
A sergeant used pepper spray and physical force.
The father was arrested, and the court reportedly convicted him of the resulting charges.
The department reportedly cleared the sergeant following its initial review.
Yet public scrutiny continues.
I am not going to manufacture a definitive legal conclusion from incomplete evidence.
But neither am I going to suggest that a conviction or an internal finding automatically ends the professional discussion.
I want the complete encounter examined. I want the force explained. I want the missing-child response understood.
And above all, I want the lessons from incidents like this used to improve how police officers communicate, make decisions, and serve the people who come to them for help.
My standard for professional policing is not simply whether an officer can defend an action after the fact. It is whether officers consistently demonstrate the judgment, discipline, and competence that the profession demands.
That is the standard I want to see across American law enforcement.
CLICK HERE to get your copy of
The Mena Police Department incident raises important questions about police authority, the use of force, professional judgment, and accountability.
For my complete breakdown and additional Cop Talk LIVE commentary, watch the accompanying video.
Additional police use-of-force analysis, training discussions, and accountability commentary are available through Cop Talk LIVE.
Join Cop Talk LIVE Members Only
If you believe American law enforcement should be held to a higher professional standard, I invite you to become part of the Cop Talk LIVE community.
Membership starts at $10 per month and provides access to private briefings, professional discussions, case updates when available, and opportunities for direct participation.
Join Cop Talk LIVE Members Only:
https://www.patreon.com/c/coptalklive/membership
Do Not Meet the Standard — Become the Standard.
About The Author
Discover more from Cop Talk LIVE
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
